William M. Bishop and Pinnacle Potash International, Ltd v. E. Barger Miller, III and Reunion Potash Company
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARTHA HILL JAMISON, Justice.'
These cross appeals concern the alleged misappropriation of trade secrets relating to a process for mining potash in a particular area of Utah. In its appeal, Reunion Potash Company contends that the evidence is legally insufficient to sustain the jury’s finding that it misappropriated trade secrets belonging to William E. Bishop and Pinnacle Potash International, Ltd. In their cross appeal, Bishop and Pinnacle contend that the trial court erred in submitting a proportionate responsibility question, which asked the jury to apportion responsibility for the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- MacK Trucks, Inc. v. TamezTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Osterberg v. PecaTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Spencer v. Eagle Star Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1994
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Globeranger Corp. v. Software AG United States of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- Eagle Oil & Gas Co. v. Shale Exploration, LLCCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
- Hunter Buildings & Manufacturing, L.P. v. MBI Global, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2014
- Saba Zi Exploration, LP v. Lane Vaughn, Terry Selland and Fort Peck Oil & Gas, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
- Alief Independent School District, Dan Turner and Henry Bonaparte v. Troy Perry, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.