Legal Opinion

Hoffler v. Wheeler

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 19, 1962No. 2854PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Chief Judge.

The question on this appeal relates to the admissibility in evidence of the deposition of a witness taken by plaintiff more than twenty days after commencement of the action but prior to service ot process upon the defendant.

These are the facts. Plaintiff’s automobile, driven by his daughter, was in a collision with an automobile driven by defendant, and plaintiff sued for property damages. The complaint was filed on May 6, 19S9, but service of process on defendant was not made until October 30, 1959. However, on June 26, 1959, defendant was personally served by plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sunbeam Corp. v. Payless Drug StoresDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1953
  2. Caldwell-Clements, Inc. v. McGraw-Hill Pub. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
  3. Caribbean Const. Corp. v. Kennedy Van Saun Mfg. & Eng. Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952
  4. In re American Anthracite & Bituminous Coal Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958
  5. Netter v. Ashland Paper Mills, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Royal BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963
  2. Brown v. TannerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  3. Frizzell v. Wes Pine Millwork, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1976
  4. Smallwood v. Ray's Automatic Transmission Service, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API