Legal Opinion
United States v. Vijay Parekh
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided March 28, 1991No. 90-8332PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge:
Defendant Vijay Parekh stands convicted for his role in the improper efforts of a savings and loan association’s officials to meet minimum net worth requirements imposed by the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (FHLBB). He asserts that insufficient evidence supports his convictions and that the prosecutor’s purportedly improper comments mandate a new trial. Rejecting both of these claims, we affirm.
I
In 1985, Lamar Savings Association (Lamar), a financial institution insured by the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Cor poration, found it increasingly difficult to meet…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Nelson BellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Standefer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- United States v. David Lamar Faulkner, Spencer H. Blain, Jr., James L. Toler and Arthur FormannCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. PettigrewCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Dwayne A. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- United States v. MorrowCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Fred De La MataCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.