Legal Opinion

United States v. Fred De La Mata

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided September 27, 2001No. 00-10201, 00-13319PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FAY, Circuit Judge:

Fred De La Mata, Manuel A. Calas, Oscar Castilla and Enrique Fernandez (“appellants”) appeal their criminal convictions and sentences for bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344, conspiracy to defraud the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, misapplication of bank funds, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 656, making false statements to a federally insured financial institution, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1014, money laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956, making or causing to be made false entries, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1005, and engaging and conspiring…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  3. Toussie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Lynce v. MathisSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. United States v. BrandonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. United States v. Meier Jason BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. J. Richard JamiesonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. Mauricio Javier PucheCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. Marvin HershCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API