Legal Opinion
Clement v. Public Service Electric & Gas Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 23, 2001No. CIV.A. 99-5370PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION
ORLOFSKY, District Judge.
On December 11, 2000, this Court filed an Opinion and Order dismissing the Plaintiffs Complaint without prejudice and directing Plaintiffs counsel, Lorraine Harris (“Harris”), to show cause whether she had violated Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(b)(2). See Clement v. Public Service Electric and Gas Company, 122 F.Supp.2d 551 (D.N.J.2000). For the reasons set forth below, I find that Harris violated Fed.R.Civ.P. 11(b)(2) by failing to conduct a reasonable inquiry into the facts and applicable law before filing the Complaint in this case.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Martin v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Langer v. Monarch Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Schering Corp. v. Vitarine Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Slater v. Skyhawk Transportation, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Zion v. NassanDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Leuallen v. Borough of PaulsboroDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
- Mendez v. DrahamDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
- In re FreemanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Oswell v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.