Legal Opinion
Leuallen v. Borough of Paulsboro
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 10, 2002No. Civil 99-4353(JBS)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SIMANDLE, District Judge.
When an attorney, in response to the Court’s concern that his 34-page Complaint on behalf of multiple plaintiffs alleging various civil rights violations against various local police departments cannot be understood, responds nonetheless with a 160-page Amended Complaint compounding the difficulties and asserting claims-that are legally and factually nonsensical, there will be consequences. This Opinion, issued following a hearing after due notice to plaintiffs’ counsel, Samuel A. Malat, Esquire, upon the Court’s own initiative under Rule 11(c)(1)(B),…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. KozminskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Martin v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Ford Motor Co. v. Summit Motor Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Langer v. Monarch Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Santiago v. City of VinelandDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- HT of Highlands Ranch, Inc. v. Hollywood Tanning Systems, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
- Keister v. PPL Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Mendez v. DrahamDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
- EDWARDS v. WELLS FARGO BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
- EDWARDS v. WELLS FARGO BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.