Legal Opinion

Brown v. Exactech, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided March 26, 2019No. 3:17-cv-00555 REEVES/GUYTONPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Pamela L. Reeves, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Defendants have moved for summary judgment [D. 59] on all of Plaintiff's claims [D. 57]. Because the claims are time-barred, Defendants' motion will be GRANTED .

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Defendants, Exactech, Inc. and Exactech *814US, Inc.1 produce medical devices, and specialize in manufacturing orthopedic devices for joint arthroplasties (i.e., joint replacements) [D. 61-2, pp. 4-5]. For hip replacements, Exactech produces a device known as the "AcuMatch M-Series Fem-oral Stem" [see D. 61-6; D. 57, ¶ 8]. Plaintiff underwent a total left hip replacement…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. In Re Paoli Railroad Yard Pcb LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  3. Childs v. HausseckerTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Galbraith Engineering Consultants, Inc. v. PochuchaTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Smith v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API