Legal Opinion

Boyle Holding Corp. v. Medgreen Holding Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1933PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCohn, J.

There was adduced no proof to establish defendant’s claim that in the sale of defendant’s property fraud was practiced by the plaintiff, by the Port of New York Authority (hereinafter referred to as the authority) through any of its officers, or by the real estate brokerage corporation which negotiated the sale. Certain it is that those connected with the authority acted fairly and honorably throughout. Though the broker knew that the plaintiff corporation was used as a cloak to conceal the identity of the authority, it was under no duty to disclose that fact to the vendor. So long as the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Merry Realty Co. v. Shamokin & Hollis Real Estate Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Saperstein v. Mechanics & Farmers Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Ostroff v. . DoctorNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  4. Zauderer v. Market Street Long Beach Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Zauderer v. Market St. Long Beach Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Arhart v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Sorivi v. BaldiDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
  3. Newman v. ResnickNew York Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Richards v. BaumUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Richards v. BaumUtah Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API