Legal Opinion
Zauderer v. Market Street Long Beach Realty Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 18, 1926PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarswell, J.
This is a motion for a reargument of a motion made by the defendants to bring in under section 193 of the Civil Practice Act certain parties defendant, coincident with the service of an amended answer setting up counterclaims against said new parties. I will reconsider the whole matter.
The action is one brought for the down payment made by the plaintiff on a contract for the sale of real property. Plaintiff *365claims he was an infant at the time of the making of the contract. The defendants in a proposed counterclaim which they have already pleaded as a defense claim one Kimmelman and one…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kromback v. KillianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Travlos v. Commercial Union of America, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- Williams v. Edward DeV. Tompkins, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Lewis H. May Co. v. Mott Avenue Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1923
3Cited by7 opinions
- Boyle Holding Corp. v. Medgreen Holding Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1933
- Walker v. ManNew York Supreme Court · 1931
- Hotel Antlers, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co. of New York, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1932
- Schultz v. WilsonPort Jervis City Court · 1969
- Beaunit Mills, Inc. v. Tanbro Fabrics Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.