Legal Opinion
Arhart v. Thompson
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 28, 1947No. File 7040PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBtjeR, J.
This is an action to compel specific performance. The defendants are sisters. In order to avoid confusion we refer to them as Clara and Agnes. Both are experienced business women.
The complaint alleges: Clara is the owner of the property involved; in September 1945 she accepted plaintiff’s oiler to buy the same for $2350 and took his check for $100 given as earnest money; she agreed to deliver a warranty deed conveying the premises upon the payment of the remainder of the $2350; by letter received about October 3, 1945, she advised him she would not sell the premises to him and returned the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kennedy v. HazeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Smith v. BanghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Horgan v. RussellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
- Halsell v. RenfrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Lowe v. HarmonOregon Supreme Court · 1941
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gunsch v. GunschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
- Arhart v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
- Bolyea v. First Presbyterian Church of Wilton, NDNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
- Sand v. Red River National Bank & Trust Co. of Grand ForksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Normandin v. Eastland Partners, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.