Legal Opinion
Ingram v. Howard
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided May 29, 1930No. 8 Div. 157PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
It is incumbent on mechanics and materialmen, who claim and seek to enforce statutory liens, to aver and prove a compliance with the provisions of the statute in respect to filing a verified statement in the office of the judge of probate of the county in which the property on which the lien is sought to be established is situated. Code 1923, § 8836; Robinson et al. v. Crotwell Brothers Lumber Co., 167 Ala. 566, 52 So. 733; Gilbert v. Talladega Hdw. Co., 195 Ala. 474, 70 So. 660; Wilbourne et al. v. Mann et al., 203 Ala. 26, 81 So. 816.
It must be conceded that the averment of paragraph 5 of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Salzer Lumber Co. v. ClaflinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
- Hughes v. TorgersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- Sorg v. CrandallIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
- Bedsole v. PetersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
- Eastern Ohio Oil Co. v. McEvoySupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Cady v. KerrWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Central Lumber Co. v. JacksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Snellings Lumber Co. v. PorterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Wood Lumber Co. v. GreathouseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Byrum Hardware Co. v. Jenkins Bldg. Supply Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.