Legal Opinion
Northeast Knox Utility District v. Stanfort Construction Co.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Decided May 16, 2006No. E2005-01284-COA-R3-CVPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · FranksHerschel Pickens Franks, P.J.
in which SHARON G. LEE, J., joined, and CHARLES D. SUSANO, JR., J., filed a separate dissenting opinion.
*457The Trial Court granted defendants summary judgment on the grounds the statute of limitations had run on plaintiffs claims. On appeal, we vacate and remand.
In this action, defendants were granted summary judgment on the grounds that the statute of limitations had ran on plaintiffs cause of action.
BACKGROUND
On April 9,1999, Southern Constructors, Inc. (“Southern”) and Northeast Knox Utility District (“NEKUD”) entered into a contract for the construction of a raw water intake on the…
3Cases cited14 opinions
- Staples v. CBL & Associates, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- Guy v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2002
- John Kohl & Co. PC v. Dearborn & EwingTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
- Merriman v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1979
- Seavers v. Methodist Medical Center of Oak RidgeTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by19 opinions
- THURSTON HENSLEY v. CSX Transp., Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2009
- Wilson v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2009
- First American Title Insurance v. Cumberland County BankDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2009
- Adams v. Delk, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2021
- Amirazodi v. Capella Education CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2022
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.