Legal Opinion
Juvenile Products Manufacturers Ass'n v. Edmisten
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided August 10, 1983No. Civ. 82-649-CIV-5PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BRITT, District Judge,
Plaintiff, Juvenile Products Manufacturers Association, Inc., [JPMA], a non-profit trade association whose members manufacture juvenile products, including child restraint systems, instituted this civil action seeking declaratory and injunctive relief from certain North Carolina Motor Vehicle laws and regulations. The court issued a preliminary injunction in this matter on 15 June 1982. Because the parties anticipated additional federal legislation in the area, the court deferred further consideration in this action. That legislation has been enacted,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Vanover v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1986
- Baird v. General Motors Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1986
- Bianco v. California Highway PatrolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Robbins v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
- Talalai v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.