Legal Opinion
Baird v. General Motors Corp.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided October 31, 1986No. C84-2874APublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DOWD, District Judge.
Before the Court is the motion of the defendant, General Motors Corporation, for partial summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The plaintiff, Lois E. Baird, has responded. The parties have supplemented their motions with affidavits and other documents, and with additional legal briefs. For the reasons that follow, the motion is granted.
I
On August 12, 1982, William C. Baird II, the decedent of the plaintiff, was driving a 1979 Pontiac Grand Am on a public highway in Summit County, Ohio. The automobile veered off…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Maryland v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Erling David Larsen v. General Motors Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- Michigan Canners & Freezers Assn., Inc. v. Agricultural Marketing and Bargaining Bd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Patricia M. Wood v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Emma Taylor v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Anne Duffy Pokorny, Administratrix of the Estate of John Duffy, Deceased v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Schwartz v. Volvo North America Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Cellucci v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.