Legal Opinion

Wichita Falls, R. & F. W. R. v. Mendoza

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 30, 1922No. 1293PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

Appellee, the surviving wife of Catarino Mendoza, decéased, brought this suit against the appellant to recover damages for the alleged negligent killing of her husband. For cause of action it was alleged that on May 5, 1920, the deceased was employed as a section hand by the defendant, and upon the afternoon of the date stated returned from his work to Ranger on one of defendant’s trains, and alighted therefrom at the depot in said town, and thereupon started walking to his home, and while walking by the side of defendant’s track at and near the intersection of a switch line the defendant…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. ShiederTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Texas v. HarringtonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  3. Texas Midland R.R. Co. v. ByrdTexas Supreme Court · 1909
  4. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. MathisTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Jamison Gin Co. v. MeaselsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Grant v. HartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  2. Constitution Indemnity Co. of Philadelphia v. ArmbrustCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  3. Houston T. C. R. Co. v. StriblingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Epting v. NeesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. Butler v. HerringCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API