Legal Opinion
State v. Compton
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 20, 1980No. 50950, 51067PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHERAN, Chief Justice.
These pretrial criminal appeals have been combined because the two prosecutions for concealing stolen property arose from the same incident and involve a similarity of facts and a relationship of issues. One (State v. Nate Baxter Compton, No. 50950) is an appeal by the state pursuant to R. 29.03, subd. 1, R.Crim.P., from an order of the district court suppressing evidence on Fourth Amendment grounds and dismissing the prosecution. The other (State v, Eugene Elmer Compton, No. 51067) involves a question certified pursuant to R. 29.02, subd. 4, R.Crim.P., by a different…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Cupp v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. CoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- State v. CliffordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. NadingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. AilportCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. LiggonsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.