Legal Opinion
State v. Ailport
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 29, 1987No. C5-87-454PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LOMMEN, Judge.
Appellant Dale Ailport was convicted of possession of a schedule I controlled substance (LSD) with intent to distribute, receiving stolen property, and possession of a stun gun by a felon, in violation of Minn. Stat. §§ 152.09, subd. 1(1), 152.15, subd. 1(2) (1984); Minn.Stat. § 609.53, subd. 1(1) (1984); and Minn.Stat. §§ 624.731, subd. 3(b) and 624.713, subd. 1(b) (1984 and Supp. 1985). Appellant claims his arrest was not supported by probable cause and the trial court erred in not suppressing the evidence found in and on the car and inside the suitcase in the car…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Michigan v. SummersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Colorado v. BertineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Arkansas v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Parks v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. FlittieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Stanford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- State v. MadsenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000
- Fromm v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.