Legal Opinion
Downeast Ventures, Ltd. v. Washington County
District Court, D. Maine
Decided September 7, 2006No. CV-05-87-B-WPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS IN LIMINE AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LATE DESIGNATION OF EXPERT
WOODCOCK, District Judge.
Asserting that a corporate employee is not qualified absent expert designation to testify to the value of corporate property, the Defendants have moved in limine to prevent Downeast Ventures, Ltd. (Downeast) from introducing lay testimony about the value of its property, since Downeast failed to designate a valuation expert. In turn, Downeast filed a motion for late designation of an additional expert witness to name a corporate employee as a valuation expert. Concluding that,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. MaherCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Macaulay v. AnasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Santiago-Díaz v. Laboratorio Clínico Y De Referencia Del EsteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Tampa Bay Shipbuilding & Repair Co. v. Cedar Shipping Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Ayala-PizarroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Morel v. Daimler-Chrysler Corp.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2009
- Bennett v. SAINT-GOBAIN CORPORATIONDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
- Coldwell Banker Real Estate, LLC v. Brian Moses Realty, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2010
- Griffith v. Eastern Maine Medical CenterDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2009
- D’Pergo Custom Guitars, Inc. v. P Sweetwater Sound, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.