Legal Opinion
Morel v. Daimler-Chrysler Corp.
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
Decided June 15, 2009No. Civil No. 05-2162 (FAB)PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER1
BESOSA, District Judge.
On April 27, 2009, defendant Daimler AG (“defendant”), formerly known as Daimler-Chrysler AG, filed a motion requesting leave to substitute one of its previously disclosed expert witnesses. (Docket No. 212) Plaintiffs filed an opposition on May 13, 2009, requesting that the motion be denied unless certain conditions were placed on defendant’s substitution. (Docket No. 219) On May 22, 2009, defendant filed a response to plaintiffs’ opposition. (Docket No. 222)
For the reasons discussed below, the Court hereby GRANTS defendant leave to substitute its…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Wilson v. Bradlees of New England, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Charles M. Thibeault v. Square D CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Poulis Minott v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Macaulay v. AnasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Fidelity National Financial, Inc. v. National Union Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2015
- Baumann v. American Family Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2012
- D’Pergo Custom Guitars, Inc. v. P Sweetwater Sound, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2020
- Tavárez-Guerrero v. Toledo-DávilaDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2010
- Carballido v. Target CorporationDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2021
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.