Bennett v. SAINT-GOBAIN CORPORATION
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SAYLOR, District Judge.
This is an action for age discrimination and unlawful retaliation. Plaintiff David Bennett contends that he was unlawfully discharged by defendant Saint-Gobain Corporation because of his age and in retaliation for filing a grievance in which he accused his supervisor, defendant Timothy Feagans, of age discrimination. He also contends that defendants Feagans and John R. Mesher tortiously interfered with his contractual relations with Sainb-Go-bain. Pending before the Court is defendants’ motion for summary…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Samuel Mesnick v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bennett v. Saint-Gobain Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Singleton v. Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
- Coogan v. FMR, LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
- Dyjak v. Baystate Health Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
- Cadigan v. Align Technology, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.