Gurantee Trust Life Ins. v. Koenig
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Frank Holt, Justice.
The appellee, the insured, suffered a heart attack and the appellant, the insurer, paid him $100.00 per month for approximately two years. The appellant refused further payments upon the basis that appellee could no longer show his sickness required continuous house confinement within the meaning of the insurance policy. The jury resolved the issue in favor of the appellee and from a judgment accordingly is this appeal.
The pertinent portion of the insurance policy provides :
“If the Insured, because of such sickness, shall be continuously confined within doors and regularly…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- OCCIDENTAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. OF CAL. v. SammonsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
- Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. MurphySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
- Colorado Life Co. v. SteeleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- Michigan Life Insurance Co. v. HayesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
- Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. RowellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Parker v. HolderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Pennsylvania Life Insurance v. BumbreyDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1987
- Cassady v. United Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1974
- Newberry v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Williams v. FletcherCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.