Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Reynolds v. Smith

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1963PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

We deem the issues on this appeal to be: (1) Did respondent rightly refuse to sign the instant check which was issued at the request of the attorney general, in the form of a voucher that had been properly audited, as security for costs in a federal court action that the attorney general had instituted pursuant to the direction of the governor?(2) If the foregoing question be answered in the negative, have subsequent events rendered moot the relief requested with respect to compelling the state treasurer to sign such check ?

In resolving the first-stated issue we think it advisable to consider…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Clark v. BarnardSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. State ex rel. Attorney General v. CunningamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  3. State ex rel. Bolens v. FrearWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  4. State ex rel. Lamb v. CunninghamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  5. State v. SnyderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lister v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin SystemWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State Ex Rel. Reynolds v. ZimmermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Manchin v. BrowningWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. City of Oak CreekWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  5. City of Kenosha v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API