Legal Opinion

Puget Sound Harvesters Ass'n v. Department of Fish & Wildlife

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 28, 2010No. 39435-9-IIPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPenoyar, C.J.

¶1 The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) appeals the trial court’s invalidation of two Washington administrative rules. In 2008, WDFW adopted the two rules, setting the 2008 fall chum salmon fishing schedule in South Puget Sound areas 10 and 11. WDFW allocated fishing opportunities between the gillnetters and purse seiners rather than placing a limit on the total catch of either group. The trial court invalidated the two rules, ruling that they were arbitrary and capricious. We affirm the trial court’s rulings invalidating the 2008 versions of WAC 220-47-311 and WAC 220-47-411…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hillis v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Hillis v. State, Dept. of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Silverstreak, Inc. v. STATE DEPT. OF LABORWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Silverstreak, Inc. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Washington Independent Telephone Ass'n v. Washington Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Raven v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Robert Sudar v. Fish & Wildlife CommissionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  3. Puget Sound Crab Ass'n v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  4. Center For Environmental Law & Policy v. State Of WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  5. Psha. v. Dept. of Fish & WildlifeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API