Washington Independent Telephone Ass'n v. Washington Utilities & Transportation Commission
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.
The Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission (Commission) challenges a Court of Appeals decision that invalidated WAC 480-120-540. The Court of Appeals concluded that the Commission set certain rates for telecommunications companies in the rule rather than by adjudication, and thus acted in excess of its authority. The Commission contends that rather than setting rates, WAC 480-120-540 establishes a methodology that must be used in rate setting. We agree. We also agree with the Commission that the rule is not arbitrary and capricious. We reverse the Court of Appeals.
Facts
Generally,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- At&T Corp. v. Iowa Utilities BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Hillis v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Hillis v. State, Dept. of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Electric Lightwave, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Association of Washington Spirits & Wine Distributors v. Washington State Liquor Control BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- McClarty v. Totem Elec.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
- Washington Independent Telephone Association v. Washington Utilities and Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Washington Indep. Tel. Ass'n v. Utilities and Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Washington Independent Telephone Ass'n v. Washington Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 2003
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.