Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of O'Hara

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1883No. Case No. 1524; Motion No. 445PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Marion. Tried below before the Hon. B. F. Estes.

1Opinion of the Court

Willie, Chief Justice.

A motion is made to dismiss this cause for want of a sufficient appeal bond. The objection taken to the bond is, in effect, that it does not describe the judgment from which the appeal is taken with sufficient certainty to identify it. Upon an examination of the bond we find that the name of the case is stated imperfectly, the names of the contracting parties being omitted. The number of the cause is not given, nor the date of the judgment, nor the name of the court in which it was rendered. We are not .informed who recovered the judgment, nor against whom it was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. CheathamTexas Supreme Court · 1854
  2. Herndon v. BremondTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Hollis v. BorderTexas Supreme Court · 1853

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Putnam v. PutnamArizona Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Conlee v. BurtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  3. Stephenson v. ChappellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API