Legal Opinion

Smith v. Cheatham

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1854PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Harrison. Motion to dismiss. The appeal bond was for one hundred dollars, the suit being for the recovery of land.

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.

This was an action of trespass to try title. There was judgment for the defendant, and the plaintiff appealed. The appellee moves to dismiss the appeal for the want of a sufficient appeal bond ; in that, 1st, The bond misdescribes the judgment, 2nd, It is insufficient in amount. The first objection to the bond is clearly well taken and must be sustained. The bond describes the judgment as having been rendered for the defendant, that he recover the land described in the plaintiff’s petition, &c.; whereas the record discloses a judgment simply for the defendant, “that the plaintiff take…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. King v. HopkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Vick v. Mobeetie Land Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  3. Long v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1873
  4. In re the Estate of O'HaraTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Holmes v. McIntyreTexas Supreme Court · 1884

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API