Legal Opinion

Everett v. Todd

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1894PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Arapahoe County. Action for specific performance of contract.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hayt

On the 29th day of May, 1888, one John W. Todd was the claimant, under the homestead law of the United States, of 160 acres of land in Douglas county, Colorado, and Harriette E. Harsel was the claimant, under the pre-emption law of the United States, of an adjoining 160 acres. Upon this date Todd gave a written option to the plaintiffs, W. B. Everett, William E. Gray and J. C. Carpenter, for the purchase of both of said tracts of land for the sum of $2,100. This option, by its terms, was to expire on the 1st day of August, *3231888. Afterwards, Mrs. Harsel obtained title to the land filed on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brown v. . VolkeningNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Anderson v. CarkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Oaks v. HeatonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  4. Dawson v. MerrilleNebraska Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Brown v. KennedySupreme Court of Colorado · 1888

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hornsilver Circle, Ltd. v. TropeColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Seven Lakes Reservoir Co. v. MajorsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
  3. Powder Mtn. Painting v. Peregrine Joint VentureColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Adelson v. Board of County CommissionersColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Doll v. StewartSupreme Court of Colorado · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API