Legal Opinion
State v. Kellogg
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided November 3, 1981No. 13096Published
1Opinion of the Court
636 P.2d 750 (1981)
102 Idaho 628
The STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Roscoe A. KELLOGG, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13096.
Supreme Court of Idaho.
November 3, 1981.
Stanley D. Crow and Conrad J. Aiken, Crow & Aiken, Boise, Roscoe A. Kellogg, pro se, for defendant-appellant.
David H. Leroy, Atty. Gen., Lynn E. Thomas, Sol. Gen., Boise, for plaintiff-respondent.
BISTLINE, Justice.
In Kellogg I[1] we stated the issues there presented as follows:
"Defendant-respondent Roscoe A. Kellogg was charged with the offense of selling a prescription drug, prednisolone, without legal authority to do so, in…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Jones v. State Board of MedicineIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
- Auto Drive-Away Company of Hialeah, Inc., Gertrude McKiernan and B. J. McKiernan v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Berry v. KoehlerIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.