Legal Opinion

Logan v. Curry and Arnold

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1902No. 1092PublishedCited by 41 opinions

Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Second District, in an appeal from Molan County. Curry and Arnold sued and obtained judgment against Logan, who •appealed, and on its affirmance obtained writ of error.

1Opinion of the Court

GAINES, Chief Justice.

The defendants in error each brought a separate suit against plaintiff in error for the recovery of a separate section of school land—Curry for section 38 and Arnold for section 50. Presumably for the reason that the two actions involved the same issues, of law and fact, by agreement of parties they were consolidated and tried as one. The trial, which was without a jury, resulted in a judgment for each of the plaintiffs, which judgment, upon appeal, was affirmed by the-Court of Civil Appeals.

Erom the conclusions upon the evidence, as found by the trial court,, and as…

2Cited by41 opinions

  1. Weatherly v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Laidlaw Bros. v. MarrsTexas Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Colquitt v. Gulf Production Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  4. Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Wright v. BottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API