Laidlaw Bros. v. Marrs
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pierson
Relator seeks a mandamus against respondent to require him to do and perform the ministerial or statutory duties which it has a legal right to have performed in regard to its contract with the State for the purchase of certain textbooks, to-wit: “Our Government,” Davis and McClure, Regular Edition, by the State, and the furnishing of them by it to the State under the terms of its said contract and the provisions of the statutes.
Without reciting each detailed step in the process of entering into and executing the contract by the Texas State Textbook Commission, and the action taken thereon by…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Noble v. Union River Logging RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Garfield v. United States Ex Rel. GoldsbySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Herring v. Houston National Exchange BankTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- Charles Scribner's Sons v. S.M.N. MarrsTexas Supreme Court · 1924
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Brazosport Saving & Loan Ass'n v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1961
- City of Round Rock v. Whiteaker, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
- Castilleja v. CameroTexas Supreme Court · 1967
- Colquitt v. Gulf Production Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- Hill v. Lower Colorado River AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.