Legal Opinion

State v. Milbrad

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 12, 1984No. CX-83-537PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

This appeal is from an order of the district court refusing to allow a criminal defendant to refuse probation and insist on execution of a stayed 18-month prison term. We reverse and remand.

On July 28, 1982, defendant pleaded guilty to one count of a two-count complaint charging him with the burglaries of two different rooms in a St. Paul hotel. The presumptive sentence for the offense in question (a severity level IV offense) by a person with defendant’s criminal history score (two) is 18 months stayed. The trial court sentenced defendant to 18 months, stayed execution…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. RandolphSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. State v. MurtoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. State v. WilwertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. RasinskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  2. State v. WeberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  3. State v. RasinskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  4. State v. SheppheardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. State v. HillCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API