Legal Opinion
United States v. George A. Phillips, and Luke A. Finkelstein
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided March 20, 1987No. 86-7272PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Per curiam
In this case we review the district court’s order granting the suppression of statements made by appellees to police officers and to agents of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (hereinafter Bureau). The district court found that appellees were in custody within the meaning of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966) at the time the statements were made and that appellees were not given their Miranda rights. The United States appeals from the district court’s order. Because we find that appellees were not in custody for the purposes of Miranda at the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Ian Lightbourne v. Richard L. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- United States v. JayyousiCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Frank L. FazioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. John TorkingtonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Sonia Jacobs A/K/A Sonia Linder v. Harry K. Singletary, Marta Villacorta and Jim SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.