Legal Opinion

United States v. John Torkington

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided June 7, 1989No. 88-5319PublishedCited by 96 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal arises from the district court’s grant of defendant’s motion for entry of judgment of acquittal under Fed.R. Crim.P. 29 on charges that defendant trafficked and attempted to traffic in counterfeit Rolex watches in violation of 18 U.S.C. A. § 2320(a). We reverse and remand with the direction that the case be reassigned to a different district judge.

I. FACTS

In 1985, attorneys for Rolex Watch, U.S.A., filed a civil action in the Southern District of Florida alleging that merchants at the Thunderbird Flea Market in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, were selling counterfeit Rolex watches. The…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by96 opinions

  1. Bill Clark Herbert Futch Austin Hurst Louis Sliker and William Barrineau v. Coats & Clark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  2. Chudasama v. Mazda Motor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  3. Haines v. Liggett Group Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  4. Kilgo v. RicksCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Terence George KellyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API