Legal Opinion

State v. Dusablon

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 14, 1982No. 431-80PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUnderwood, J.

This is an appeal from a guilty verdict for the offense of breaking and entering in the nighttime with the intent to commit larceny. 13 V.S.A. § 1201. The only contested issue at trial was whether the defendant intended to commit larceny. The defense was diminished mental capacity. Defendant argued that due to voluntary intoxication he lacked the specific intent to steal. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court’s charge to the jury on the element of specific intent constituted reversible error.

The court instructed the jury that the offense charged required proof of specific intent as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. RoySupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  2. State v. MessierSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
  3. State v. DoucetteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
  4. State v. DuffSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  5. State v. LaroseSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API