Legal Opinion
Lutz Tile, Inc. v. Krech
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided January 30, 2007No. 33573-5-IIPublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
151 P.3d 219 (2007)
LUTZ TILE, INC., Respondent,
v.
Paul and Kathy KRECH, Appellants.
No. 33573-5-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
January 30, 2007.
Terry Robinson, Attorney at Law, Puyallup, WA, for Appellants.
Robert William Denomy Jr., Attorney at Law, Justin David Bristol, McFerran & Burns PS, Tacoma, WA, for Respondents.
PENOYAR, J.
¶ 1 Paul and Kathy Krech assert that the trial court improperly admitted an expert report into evidence under the "catch-all" provision of ER 904 which provides for the admission of certain documentary evidence. In the report, Eric Astrachan gave his…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cockle v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. TharpWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. BourgeoisWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- City of Bellevue v. HellenthalWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- City of Bellevue v. HellenthalWashington Supreme Court · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Miller v. KennyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Yurtis v. PhippsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Yurtis v. PhippsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Kinney v. CookCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Kinney v. CookCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.