Legal Opinion

Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Pelgen

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 17, 2008No. 2006-CA-000749-MRPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VANMETER, Judge.

Homeowners’ insurance policies typically exclude policy coverage for actions intentionally caused by insureds. Under Kentucky precedent, certain actions by the insured give rise to an “inferred intent,” regardless of the actor’s actual intent, so as to preclude coverage. The issue we must address is whether the Campbell Circuit Court erred in failing to apply the inferred intent rule to an insured who killed his wife at a time when it is alleged that he lacked the mental capacity to form intent. As we hold that the trial court erred, we reverse.

The facts are not in…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. James Graham Brown Foundation, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Horace Mann Insurance v. LeeberWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Thompson v. West American Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1992
  4. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. WagnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
  5. Deloache v. Carolina Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Encompass Indemnity Company v. GrayDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API