Legal Opinion

Encompass Indemnity Company v. Gray

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided January 21, 2020No. 3:17-cv-00713Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION ENCOMPASS INDEMNITY COMPANY Plaintiff v. Civil Action No. 3:17-cv-00713-RGJ PAUL GRAY, ET AL. Defendants * * * * * MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss (the “Motions to Dismiss”). [DE 6; DE 8].1 The matter is ripe. For the reasons below, the Court will GRANT Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss. I. BACKGROUND2 Encompass Indemnity Company (“Encompass”) issued Paul Gray and Michael Gray (the “Grays”) a multiple line policy of insurance (the “Policy”). [Id. at 2, ¶…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company, a Michigan and Indiana Corporation v. Consolidated Rail Corporation, a Pennsylvania CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  4. Amsouth Bank (03-5517) First Tennessee Bank (03-5521) v. George DaleCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  5. Northland Insurance Company v. Stewart Title Guaranty Company, Cailu Title Corporation, Donald G. Sare, Jr., and Kelly L. SareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API