Legal Opinion
Max Barnett Furniture Co. v. Bomarito
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided November 17, 1930No. 13,394PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJanvier, J.
On November 17, 1926, Max Barnett Furniture Co., Inc., sued Mrs. Bomarito, praying for judgment as the holders of a certain past due promissory-note.
The prayer of the petition asked for judgment for $158.93, interest at 8 per cent from August 2, 1926, for attorney’s fees at 10 per cent on principal and interest, and for all costs. The note sued on was annexed to and made part of the petition.
No answer was filed and on December 3, 1926, a preliminary default was entered.
Nearly three years later, on October 15, 1929, judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff as ©rayed for, subject to credits…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wilkin-Hale State Bank v. TuckerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
- Bilich v. MatheSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
- Harrison v. SoulabereSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1900
- Wilkin-Hale State Bank v. TuckerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Barnett Furniture Co. v. BommaritoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bomarito v. Max Barnett Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
- Rouseo v. Atlas Finance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
- Kelly v. MarcadeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1938
- Dunkin v. DunkinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
- Max Barnett Furniture Co., Inc. v. BomaritoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933