Legal Opinion
Rouseo v. Atlas Finance Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided July 15, 1964No. 1495PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHRIS T. BARNETTE, Judge Pro Tem.
Plaintiff brought suit for damages for illegal seizure and sale of his property, to wit, two dump trucks which he claims were tools of his trade and, as such, exempt from seizure and sale. An exception of no cause or right of action and a plea of res judicata were filed. The exception, of no cause or right of action was maintained and plaintiff’s suit dismissed. From the judgment dismissing his suit, plaintiff has appealed.
The defendant brought suit against this plaintiff in the First City Court of New *496Orleans and obtained a judgment of $213.-22, interest and…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. American Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
- California Company v. PriceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
- Quarles v. LewisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
- Buillard v. DavisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
- Woodcock v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lege v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
- Coates Equipment & Service, Inc. v. GloverLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
- Baker v. Wheless Drilling CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
- American Mannex Corp. v. PrejeanDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1971
- Rousseo v. Atlas Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1964