Legal Opinion
Bomarito v. Max Barnett Furniture Co.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided July 7, 1933No. 31642PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAND, Justice.
Upon the face of the original petition filed in this case, plaintiff’s suit is for the sum of $5,261 damages, alleged to have been suffered by her by the seizure of her furniture and household effects under am, illegal judgment, secured by plaintiff against defendant “in proceedings entitled Max Barnett Furniture Co. v. Mrs. Mary Bomarito, No. 165,982 of the docket of the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans.”
After several exceptions of vagueness were tendered and sustained, and after the first and second amended petitions had been filed in response thereto, defendant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Citizens' Bank of Columbia v. Bellamy Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
- Jefferson v. GammSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Holland v. BryanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
- Baker v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
- Max Barnett Furniture Co. v. BomaritoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Wetherbee v. Lodwick Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
- Henry Waters Truck & Tractor Co., Inc. v. RelanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
- Gootee Const., Inc. v. Amwest Sur. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
- Central Progressive Bank v. BradleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
- Lisi Realty, Inc. v. PlaisanceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.