United States v. City Bank of Columbus
Supreme Court of the United States
This ease came up on a certificate of division in opinion .between the judges of the Circuit Court of the United;States for the southern district of Ohio. The case is stated in the opinion of the court;.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Daniel
delivered the opinion of the eourt.. This cause is brought before us upon a certificate of a division of opinion between the judges of the Circuit Court of the U nited States for the southern district of Ohio.
The United States instituted their action of assumpsit against the defendants, for the recovery of a sum of money, laying their damages at two hundred thousand dollars; .
The declaration consisted of two counts. The first was upon an alleged agreement between the United States and the City Bank of Columbus, whereby the latter, on the 1st day of November, 1850, contracted and undertook to…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Triplett v. LowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Jewell v. KnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. McFarlandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- State-Planters Bank & Trust Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.