Legal Opinion

State v. Marks

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1995No. 93-2452-CRPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam A. Bablitch, J.

During the trial of Joseph L. Marks for burglary, his accomplice, Scott Meyer, who had already pled guilty and had been convicted and sentenced on the burglary charge, invoked his privilege against self-incrimination and refused to testify. The circuit court, declaring Meyer unavailable as a witness, allowed Meyer's prior testimony at Marks' preliminary examination into evidence. The court of appeals agreed, holding that Meyer had a real and appreciable fear of self-incrimination as a result of his expressed intention to seek modification of his sentence. Marks appeals, arguing that the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Allen v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Reina v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Temple v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1881

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hodge v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. AgnelloWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State Ex Rel. Tate v. SchwarzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Martin v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  5. State v. ShowalterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API