Legal Opinion

Fay Corp. v. Bat Holdings I, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided March 25, 1988No. C86-542DPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DIMMICK, District Judge.

THIS MATTER was tried before this Court without a jury March 14 to March 17, 1988. Trial followed several rulings by this Court granting partial summary judgment.1 In a prior ruling, the Court determined that a novation had occurred with the 1982 assignment of the 99-year lease of the building and grounds on which the downtown Seattle Frederick & Nelson department store is located. This novation revived the gold clause in the lease and established plaintiff’s right to rental payments in gold or its equivalency. The only issues for trial were…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McDaniels v. CarlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Bowman v. WebsterWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Kessinger v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Wilson v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Wilson v. DanielsWashington Supreme Court · 1948

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bank of America NT&SACalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. Fay Corp. v. Frederick & Nelson Seattle, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. The Fay Corporation v. Frederick & Nelson Seattle, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bank of America NT&SACalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API