Martin v. McKinney
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Upon an appeal from a judgment of ■ the County Court of Mason county.
1Opinion of the Court
The judgment of the county court does not state whether the discontinuance of the license granted to Martin for keeping a ferry over the Ohio river at Maysvilleywas for his neglecting to furnish the necessary boats, the number of hands to attend it required by the court, within the time prescribed by law, or that the same had been wholly disused and unfrequented for the space of two years, some one of which causes should appear upon the face of their proceedings. This being a law which authorizes the county court to interfere with and deprive citizens of their rights and property in a summary…
2Cited by21 opinions
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. WylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Love v. Southern Railway Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1901
- Macklin v. DunnTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. FosterTennessee Supreme Court · 1882
- Iron & Coal Co. v. BroylesTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.