Legal Opinion

Ludack v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 25, 2012No. 49A02-1109-CR-930PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRONE, Judge.

Case Summary

John Ludack was convicted of two counts of class A felony child molesting and adjudicated a habitual offender and sentenced to an aggregate term of one hundred thirty years. On appeal, he argues that his constitutional right against compulsory self-inerimination was violated when the detective who interviewed him testified that Ludack neither admitted nor denied the allegations of child molesting but just asked to stop speaking. Ludack also argues that his sentence is inappropriate in light of the nature of the offenses and his character.

We conclude that…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Cardwell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Delmar Kelly v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Santiago Valdez v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Delmar Kelly v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Philip Cazallis v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API