Legal Opinion
State v. Morse
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided July 25, 2014No. 2013-045PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtReiber, C.J.
¶ 1. Defendant appeals a restitution order requiring him to pay $2,427.36 for damage to a car. On appeal, defendant argues that (1) the State failed to meet its burden of demonstrating that the victim’s loss was uninsured; (2) the court failed to make a specific finding that the damage was uninsured; (3) the court erred in admitting and using a repair estimate because it was hearsay; and (4) the court erred in calculating the amount of restitution by using the cost of repair rather than the difference in fair market value before and after the accident. We affirm.
¶ 2. The charges in this case…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Robers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- United States v. GushlakCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- United States v. ZangariCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- State v. GallagherSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- United States v. Donna Marie SunrhodesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. Randell BlakeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
- People v. VasseurColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. Ty Baker, Sr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2017
- State v. Philip M. TetreaultSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
- State v. CornellSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.