Legal Opinion
Daugherty Associates v. Silmon
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided October 28, 1988No. 87-896PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from the trial court's denial of Daugherty Associates' Rule 60(b), A.R.Civ.P., motion for relief from a consent judgment. We affirm.
On March 18, 1986, First Southern Federal Savings and Loan Association foreclosed its mortgage on certain property. Daugherty Associates ("Daugherty") purchased this property at the foreclosure sale. On February 12, 1987, Earl C. Bloom, attorney for Perry and Nancy Russell, the debtors under the foreclosed mortgage, requested that Daugherty furnish a written statement of the debt and lawful charges, pursuant to Ala. Code 1975, § 6-5-234.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Smith v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Ex Parte Hartford Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- City of Birmingham v. City of FairfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Raine v. First Western BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Douglass v. Capital City Church of NazareneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ex Parte Alfa Mut. General Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- Ex Parte Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998
- Ross v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. GreenCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999
- Higgins v. DouglasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.