Legal Opinion

Judy v. Schaefer

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 22, 1993No. 138, September Term, 1992PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELDRIDGE, Judge.

The petitioners in this case are indigent individuals representing themselves and certified classes of recipients of General Public Assistance, Aid to Families with Dependent Children, and Medical Assistance State Only. They challenge the validity of the Governor’s action reducing appropriations pursuant to Maryland Code (1985, 1988 Repl-Vol.), § 7-213 of the State Finance and Procurement Article.

Section 7-213 of the State Finance and Procurement Article authorizes the Governor, with the approval of the Board of Public Works, to reduce, by not more than 25%, any appropriation…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Exxon Corp. v. Governor of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Mayor of Baltimore v. State ex rel. Board of PoliceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1860
  3. Department of Natural Resources v. Linchester Sand & Gravel Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  4. Montgomery County v. Woodward & Lothrop, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  5. Governor of the State v. Exxon Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. McCray v. Maryland Department of Transportation, Maryland Transit AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
  2. Christ v. Maryland Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  3. Gisriel v. Ocean City Board of Supervisors of ElectionsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  4. Benson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  5. Fogle v. H & G Restaurant, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1995

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API