Legal Opinion
In re Robert H.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 20, 1986No. 12516; 12517; 12540PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.
The principal issue on this appeal is whether the trial court erred in granting the motion to quash the three respondents’ subpoena that sought records from a sexual assault counselor who assisted the victim at a rape crisis center because of the statutory privilege accorded by General Statutes § 52-146k. The respondents Robert H. and Richard C. additionally raise the issue of whether there was sufficient evidence of intent to prove they had violated General Statutes §§ 53a-70 and 53a-8. The respondent Blair P. also raises two issues: (1) whether he was adjudged *695delinquent without sufficient…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- State v. KulmacSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Commonwealth v. KyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. StockhammerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- State v. BrunoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Zaal v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.