Legal Opinion

Zaal v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 16, 1992No. 28, September Term, 1991PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT M. BELL, Judge.

In this case, we are asked to decide whether, pursuant to a lawfully issued subpoena, see COMAR 13A.08.02.20A, 1 a defendant charged with child sexual abuse, may inspect the school records of the child he has allegedly abused. The Court of Special Appeals responded in the negative, when it addressed the issue. Zaal v. State, 85 Md.App. 430, 584 A.2d 119 (1991). We granted the petition for writ of certiorari, filed by petitioner, Iwan Zaal, to review the important issue. We shall reverse.

I

Petitioner was charged with sexual child abuse of his twelve year old granddaughter,…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. People v. StanawayMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Commonwealth v. BishopMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  3. Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  4. Kirwan v. the DiamondbackCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  5. State v. GagneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API